[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190325211405.GP2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:14:06 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+7a8ba368b47fdefca61e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in path_lookupat
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:18:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> COMPLETELY UNTESTED. And no filesystems converted to actually use the
> new rcu_destroy_inode() thing.
>
> Hmm?
Maybe, but we really need to come up with sane documentation on the
entire drop_inode/evict_inode/destroy_inode/rcu_destroy_inode
group ;-/ And I want to understand the writeback-related issues
in ocfs2 and f2fs - the current kludges in those smell fishy.
> if (unlikely(inode_init_always(sb, inode))) {
> - if (inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode)
> + if (inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode) {
> inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode(inode);
> - else
> + if (!inode->i_sb->s_op->rcu_destroy_inode)
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + if (!inode->i_sb->s_op->rcu_destroy_inode ||
> + !inode->i_sb->s_op->rcu_destroy_inode(inode))
> kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, inode);
ITYM i_callback(inode); here, possibly suitably renamed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists