linux-kernel - Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 21:14:06 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+7a8ba368b47fdefca61e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in path_lookupat

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:18:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> COMPLETELY UNTESTED. And no filesystems converted to actually use the
> new rcu_destroy_inode() thing.
> 
> Hmm?

Maybe, but we really need to come up with sane documentation on the
entire drop_inode/evict_inode/destroy_inode/rcu_destroy_inode
group ;-/  And I want to understand the writeback-related issues
in ocfs2 and f2fs - the current kludges in those smell fishy.

>  	if (unlikely(inode_init_always(sb, inode))) {
> -		if (inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode)
> +		if (inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode) {
>  			inode->i_sb->s_op->destroy_inode(inode);
> -		else
> +			if (!inode->i_sb->s_op->rcu_destroy_inode)
> +				return NULL;
> +		}
> +		if (!inode->i_sb->s_op->rcu_destroy_inode ||
> +		    !inode->i_sb->s_op->rcu_destroy_inode(inode))
>  			kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, inode);

ITYM  i_callback(inode); here, possibly suitably renamed.