[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190325215105.GB24180@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:51:06 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pakki001@....edu,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pci: pcie-xilinx: fix a missing-check bug for
__get_free_pages
Hi Kangjie,
Thanks for the patch!
Please update the subject line like this:
PCI: xilinx: Check for __get_free_pages() failure
You can always get a good idea of the style for subject lines by doing
something like this:
git log --oneline --follow drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:31:13PM -0500, Kangjie Lu wrote:
> In case __get_free_pages fail, the fix returns -ENOMEMto avoid
> NULL pointer dereference.
s/In case/If/
s/__get_free_pages/__get_free_pages()/
s/fail/fails/
s/the fix returns/return/
s/-ENOMEMto/-ENOMEM to/
> Signed-off-by: Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
I didn't see Steven's reviewed-by on the mailing list. I did see his
*review*, but his "Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>"
implies that he reviewed it *and* believes it to ready for merging
(see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for all the
details).
So we should only add the Reviewed-by tag after Steven himself posts
it.
> ---
> v2: caller is redefined to accept the error code, as suggested by
> Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> index 9bd1a35cd5d8..abc214e94f7c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-xilinx.c
> @@ -336,14 +336,19 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
> * xilinx_pcie_enable_msi - Enable MSI support
> * @port: PCIe port information
> */
> -static void xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> +static int xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> {
> phys_addr_t msg_addr;
>
> port->msi_pages = __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL, 0);
> + if (unlikely(!port->msi_pages))
> + return -ENOMEM;
No need to use "unlikely()" here. It *is* unlikely that
__get_free_pages() will fail, but the annotation clutters the code a
bit, so I prefer to avoid it except for performance paths.
This should probably be documented somewhere in
Documentation/process/, but regrettably, it isn't (yet).
> msg_addr = virt_to_phys((void *)port->msi_pages);
> pcie_write(port, 0x0, XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE1);
> pcie_write(port, msg_addr, XILINX_PCIE_REG_MSIBASE2);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> /* INTx Functions */
> @@ -498,6 +503,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> struct device *dev = port->dev;
> struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> struct device_node *pcie_intc_node;
> + int ret;
>
> /* Setup INTx */
> pcie_intc_node = of_get_next_child(node, NULL);
> @@ -526,7 +532,9 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(port);
> + ret = xilinx_pcie_enable_msi(port);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> }
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists