[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201903250114.x2P1EUQG004384@sdf.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 01:14:30 GMT
From: George Spelvin <lkml@....org>
To: Jason@...c4.com, lkml@....org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] random: add get_random_max() function
P.S. The cited paper calls your algorithm the "OpenBSD algorithm"
and has a bunch of benchmarks comparing it to others in Fisher-Yates
shuffles of sizes 1e3..1e9.
Including all overhead (base PRNG, shuffle), it's 3x slower for
32-bit operations and 8x slower for 64-bit up to arrays of size
1e6, after which cache misses slow all algorithms, reducing the
ratio.
If you want a faster division-based agorithm, the "Java algorithm"
does 1+retries divides:
unsigned long java(unsigned long s)
{
unsigned long x, r;
do {
x = random_integer();
r = x % s;
} while (x - r > -s);
return r;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists