linux-kernel - Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 11:11:23 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+7a8ba368b47fdefca61e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in path_lookupat

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:15:40AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > So we have 5 broken cases, all with the same kind of fix: move freeing
> > into the RCU-delayed part of ->destroy_inode(); for debugfs and bpf
> > that requires adding ->alloc_inode()/->destroy_inode(), rather than
> > relying upon the defaults from fs/inode.c
> 
> I believe I copied that logic from one of the other fs'es back then, sigh.
> Thanks for the analysis and hints for fixing. Would the below (only compile
> tested for now) look reasonable to you? I believe there is no other way
> around than to add our own inode cache, but so be it. The freeing of the
> i_link is then RCU-deferred in bpf_destroy_inode_deferred():

It looks like it would suffice, but it's way too much boilerplate for my
taste ;-/

Most of your headache here comes from messing with slab setup and the
only reason for that is being unable to free stuff into inode_cachep.
So grep for inode_cachep would be a good idea, and it digs up the
following sucker:
void free_inode_nonrcu(struct inode *inode)  
{
        kmem_cache_free(inode_cachep, inode);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_inode_nonrcu);

IOW, you need nothing on ->alloc_inode() side and for ->destroy_inode()
just do call_rcu() of a callback, that would kfree(inode->link) if
it was a symlink, then call free_inode_nonrcu(inode).

Considerably smaller patch that way...