linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] vfio/mdev: Fix to not do put_device on device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 13:48:51 +0200
From:   Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
To:     Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] vfio/mdev: Fix to not do put_device on
 device_register failure

On Fri, 2019-03-22 at 18:20 -0500, Parav Pandit wrote:
> device_register() performs put_device() if device_add() fails.
> This balances with device_initialize().
> 
> mdev core performing put_device() when device_register() fails,
> is an error that puts already released device again.
> Therefore, don't put the device on error.
> 
> Fixes: 7b96953bc640 ("vfio: Mediated device Core driver")
> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> index 0212f0e..3e5880a 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c
> @@ -318,10 +318,8 @@ int mdev_device_create(struct kobject *kobj, struct
> device *dev, uuid_le uuid)
>  	dev_set_name(&mdev->dev, "%pUl", uuid.b);
>  
>  	ret = device_register(&mdev->dev);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		put_device(&mdev->dev);
> +	if (ret)
>  		goto mdev_fail;
> -	}
>  
>  	ret = mdev_device_create_ops(kobj, mdev);
>  	if (ret)

Very good catch! Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky