[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190325134947.GA187133@google.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:49:47 -0400
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, ast@...nel.org,
atishp04@...il.com, dancol@...gle.com,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
karim.yaghmour@...rsys.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Manoj Rao <linux@...ojrajarao.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
rdunlap@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers for making it easy to
extend the kernel
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 07:19:29PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 09:35:59AM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > Introduce in-kernel headers and other artifacts which are made available
> > as an archive through proc (/proc/kheaders.txz file). This archive makes
> > it possible to build kernel modules, run eBPF programs, and other
> > tracing programs that need to extend the kernel for tracing purposes
> > without any dependency on the file system having headers and build
> > artifacts.
> >
> > On Android and embedded systems, it is common to switch kernels but not
> > have kernel headers available on the file system. Raw kernel headers
> > also cannot be copied into the filesystem like they can be on other
> > distros, due to licensing and other issues. There's no linux-headers
> > package on Android. Further once a different kernel is booted, any
> > headers stored on the file system will no longer be useful. By storing
> > the headers as a compressed archive within the kernel, we can avoid these
> > issues that have been a hindrance for a long time.
>
> The set looks good to me and since the main use case is building bpf progs
> I can route it via bpf-next tree if there are no objections.
> Masahiro, could you please ack it?
FYI, Masahiro's comments were all address by v5:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/project/lkml/list/?series=387311
I believe aren't more outstanding concerns. Could we consider it for v5.2?
thanks,
- Joel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists