[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <73ab8319a67a2d894564019c6bb0a806455987c6.camel@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 14:28:51 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mliska@...e.cz,
"H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, retpolines: entirely disable switch jump tables
when retpolines are enabled
On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 14:56 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> More than 20 switch cases are not expected to be fast-path critical, but
> it would still be good to align with gcc behavior for versions < 8.4.0 in
> order to have consistency across supported gcc versions. vmlinux size is
> slightly growing by 0.27% for older gcc. This flag is only set to work
> around affected gcc, no change for clang.
I note your final sentence doesn't actually say that clang doesn't have
this problem, and doesn't *need* this (or an equivalent) change.
It should say that (if it's true). And if it isn't true, then other
remedial action would be in order.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (5174 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists