[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190325162959.GA28275@roeck-us.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:29:59 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jie Yang <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: intel: Fix crash at suspend/resume
after failed codec registration
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 03:05:33PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 07:21:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > It is actually a bit more complicated than that. The stored pointer (drv->soc_card)
> > isn't released. The problem is that dev_get_drvdata(drv->soc_card->dev) is NULL,
> > which causes the crash. I don't think there is a UAF involved - I built the
> > test image with KASAN enabled and it did not barf at me.
>
> What is a "UAF"?
>
use-after-free. Sorry, I saw that term used so often recently that I somehow
thought it was common and started using it myself.
Guenter
> > Overall the implementation does seem a bit suspicious to me. I don't really
> > understand why the platform driver handles suspend/resume for the cards.
> > But that may just be my lack of understanding. However, either case, I think the
> > Haswell driver (sst-haswell-pcm.c) has a similar problem. I am also not sure if
>
> It's certainly a bit unusual, usually the platform driver would just
> deal with suspending itself and the card driver would handle overall
> card suspension together with the core.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists