[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7528bda2-a5a1-8f06-603c-00b7990c8bce@xs4all.nl>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:33:35 +0100
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Pawel Osciak <posciak@...omium.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...omium.org>,
Kamil Debski <kamil@...as.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Jeongtae Park <jtp.park@...sung.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Tiffany Lin (林慧珊)
<tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
Andrew-CT Chen (陳智迪)
<andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.tomov@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@...tlin.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.org,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Maxime Jourdan <maxi.jourdan@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] media: docs-rst: Document memory-to-memory video
encoder interface
On 3/25/19 2:12 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> Another comment found while creating compliance tests:
>
> On 1/24/19 11:04 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> +Drain
>> +=====
>> +
>> +To ensure that all the queued ``OUTPUT`` buffers have been processed and the
>> +related ``CAPTURE`` buffers are given to the client, the client must follow the
>> +drain sequence described below. After the drain sequence ends, the client has
>> +received all encoded frames for all ``OUTPUT`` buffers queued before the
>> +sequence was started.
>> +
>> +1. Begin the drain sequence by issuing :c:func:`VIDIOC_ENCODER_CMD`.
>> +
>> + * **Required fields:**
>> +
>> + ``cmd``
>> + set to ``V4L2_ENC_CMD_STOP``
>> +
>> + ``flags``
>> + set to 0
>> +
>> + ``pts``
>> + set to 0
>> +
>> + .. warning::
>> +
>> + The sequence can be only initiated if both ``OUTPUT`` and ``CAPTURE``
>> + queues are streaming. For compatibility reasons, the call to
>> + :c:func:`VIDIOC_ENCODER_CMD` will not fail even if any of the queues is
>> + not streaming, but at the same time it will not initiate the `Drain`
>> + sequence and so the steps described below would not be applicable.
>> +
>> +2. Any ``OUTPUT`` buffers queued by the client before the
>> + :c:func:`VIDIOC_ENCODER_CMD` was issued will be processed and encoded as
>> + normal. The client must continue to handle both queues independently,
>> + similarly to normal encode operation. This includes:
>> +
>> + * queuing and dequeuing ``CAPTURE`` buffers, until a buffer marked with the
>> + ``V4L2_BUF_FLAG_LAST`` flag is dequeued,
>> +
>> + .. warning::
>> +
>> + The last buffer may be empty (with :c:type:`v4l2_buffer`
>> + ``bytesused`` = 0) and in that case it must be ignored by the client,
>> + as it does not contain an encoded frame.
>> +
>> + .. note::
>> +
>> + Any attempt to dequeue more buffers beyond the buffer marked with
>> + ``V4L2_BUF_FLAG_LAST`` will result in a -EPIPE error from
>> + :c:func:`VIDIOC_DQBUF`.
>> +
>> + * dequeuing processed ``OUTPUT`` buffers, until all the buffers queued
>> + before the ``V4L2_ENC_CMD_STOP`` command are dequeued,
>> +
>> + * dequeuing the ``V4L2_EVENT_EOS`` event, if the client subscribes to it.
>> +
>> + .. note::
>> +
>> + For backwards compatibility, the encoder will signal a ``V4L2_EVENT_EOS``
>> + event when the last frame has been decoded and all frames are ready to be
>> + dequeued. It is deprecated behavior and the client must not rely on it.
>> + The ``V4L2_BUF_FLAG_LAST`` buffer flag should be used instead.
>> +
>> +3. Once all ``OUTPUT`` buffers queued before the ``V4L2_ENC_CMD_STOP`` call are
>> + dequeued and the last ``CAPTURE`` buffer is dequeued, the encoder is stopped
>> + and it will accept, but not process any newly queued ``OUTPUT`` buffers
>> + until the client issues any of the following operations:
>> +
>> + * ``V4L2_ENC_CMD_START`` - the encoder will not be reset and will resume
>> + operation normally, with all the state from before the drain,
>
> I assume that calling CMD_START when *not* draining will succeed but does nothing.
>
> In other words: while draining is in progress START will return EBUSY. When draining
> was finished, then START will resume the encoder. In all other cases it just returns
> 0 since the encoder is really already started.
>
>> +
>> + * a pair of :c:func:`VIDIOC_STREAMOFF` and :c:func:`VIDIOC_STREAMON` on the
>> + ``CAPTURE`` queue - the encoder will be reset (see the `Reset` sequence)
>> + and then resume encoding,
>> +
>> + * a pair of :c:func:`VIDIOC_STREAMOFF` and :c:func:`VIDIOC_STREAMON` on the
>> + ``OUTPUT`` queue - the encoder will resume operation normally, however any
>> + source frames queued to the ``OUTPUT`` queue between ``V4L2_ENC_CMD_STOP``
>> + and :c:func:`VIDIOC_STREAMOFF` will be discarded.
>> +
>> +.. note::
>> +
>> + Once the drain sequence is initiated, the client needs to drive it to
>> + completion, as described by the steps above, unless it aborts the process by
>> + issuing :c:func:`VIDIOC_STREAMOFF` on any of the ``OUTPUT`` or ``CAPTURE``
>> + queues. The client is not allowed to issue ``V4L2_ENC_CMD_START`` or
>> + ``V4L2_ENC_CMD_STOP`` again while the drain sequence is in progress and they
>> + will fail with -EBUSY error code if attempted.
>
> I assume calling STOP again once the drain sequence completed just returns 0 and
> doesn't do anything else (since we're already stopped).
>
>> +
>> + Although mandatory, the availability of encoder commands may be queried
>> + using :c:func:`VIDIOC_TRY_ENCODER_CMD`.
>
> Some corner cases:
>
> 1) No buffers are queued on either vb2_queue, but STREAMON is called for both queues.
> Now ENC_CMD_STOP is issued. What should happen?
>
> Proposal: the next time the applications queues a CAPTURE buffer it is returned
> at once as an empty buffer with FLAG_LAST set.
>
> 2) Both queues are streaming and buffers have been encoded, but currently no buffers
> are queued on either vb2_queue. Now ENC_CMD_STOP is issued. What should happen?
>
> Proposal: the next time the applications queues a CAPTURE buffer it is returned
> at once as an empty buffer with FLAG_LAST set. This is consistent with the
> previous corner case.
>
> 3) The CAPTURE queue contains buffers, the OUTPUT queue does not. Now ENC_CMD_STOP
> is issued. What should happen?
>
> Proposal: the oldest CAPTURE buffer in the ready queue is returned as an empty
> buffer with FLAG_LAST set.
>
> 4) Both queues have queued buffers. ENC_CMD_STOP is issued to start the drain process.
> Before the drain process completes STREAMOFF is called for either CAPTURE or
> OUTPUT queue. What should happen?
>
> Proposal for STREAMOFF(CAPTURE): aborts the drain process and all CAPTURE buffers are
> returned to userspace. If encoding is restarted, then any remaining OUTPUT buffers
> will be used as input to the encoder.
>
> Proposal for STREAMOFF(OUTPUT): the next capture buffer will be empty and have
> FLAG_LAST set.
Note: I'm not quite sure about that last one yet. It's a bit tricky to implement.
I think some of these rules might have to be implemented in v4l2-mem2mem.c to
simplify drivers.
Regards,
Hans
>
> Some of this might have to be documented, but these corner cases should certainly be
> tested by v4l2-compliance. Before I write those tests I'd like to know if you agree
> with this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists