Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 20:05:23 +0300
From:   Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>
To:     Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc:     Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Michael Kerrisk-manpages <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
        bl0pbl33p@...il.com, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        nagarathnam.muthusamy@...cle.com, Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] pid: add pidctl()



On 25.03.2019 19:48, Daniel Colascione wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:21 AM Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io> wrote:
>> The pidctl() syscalls builds on, extends, and improves translate_pid() [4].
>> I quote Konstantins original patchset first that has already been acked and
>> picked up by Eric before and whose functionality is preserved in this
>> syscall. Multiple people have asked when this patchset will be sent in
>> for merging (cf. [1], [2]). It has recently been revived by Nagarathnam
>> Muthusamy from Oracle [3].
>>
>> The intention of the original translate_pid() syscall was twofold:
>> 1. Provide translation of pids between pid namespaces
>> 2. Provide implicit pid namespace introspection
>>
>> Both functionalities are preserved. The latter task has been improved
>> upon though. In the original version of the pachset passing pid as 1
>> would allow to deterimine the relationship between the pid namespaces.
>> This is inherhently racy. If pid 1 inside a pid namespace has died it
>> would report false negatives. For example, if pid 1 inside of the target
>> pid namespace already died, it would report that the target pid
>> namespace cannot be reached from the source pid namespace because it
>> couldn't find the pid inside of the target pid namespace and thus
>> falsely report to the user that the two pid namespaces are not related.
>> This problem is simple to avoid. In the new version we simply walk the
>> list of ancestors and check whether the namespace are related to each
>> other. By doing it this way we can reliably report what the relationship
>> between two pid namespace file descriptors looks like.
>>
>> Additionally, this syscall has been extended to allow the retrieval of
>> pidfds independent of procfs. These pidfds can e.g. be used with the new
>> pidfd_send_signal() syscall we recently merged. The ability to retrieve
>> pidfds independent of procfs had already been requested in the
>> pidfd_send_signal patchset by e.g. Andrew [4] and later again by Alexey
>> [5]. A use-case where a kernel is compiled without procfs but where
>> pidfds are still useful has been outlined by Andy in [6]. Regular
>> anon-inode based file descriptors are used that stash a reference to
>> struct pid in file->private_data and drop that reference on close.
>>
>> With this translate_pid() has three closely related but still distinct
>> functionalities. To clarify the semantics and to make it easier for
>> userspace to use the syscall it has:
>> - gained a command argument and three commands clearly reflecting the
>>    distinct functionalities (PIDCMD_QUERY_PID, PIDCMD_QUERY_PIDNS,
>>    PIDCMD_GET_PIDFD).
>> - been renamed to pidctl()
> 
> Having made these changes, you've built a general-purpose command
> command multiplexer, not one operation that happens to be flexible.
> The general-purpose command multiplexer is a common antipattern:
> multiplexers make it hard to talk about different kernel-provided
> operations using the common vocabulary we use to distinguish
> kernel-related operations, the system call number. socketcall, for
> example, turned out to be cumbersome for users like SELinux policy
> writers. People had to do work work later to split socketcall into
> fine-grained system calls. Please split the pidctl system call so that
> the design is clean from the start and we avoid work later. System
> calls are cheap.
> 
> Also, I'm still confused about how metadata access is supposed to work
> for these procfs-less pidfs. If I use PIDCMD_GET_PIDFD on a process,
> You snipped out a portion of a previous email in which I asked about
> your thoughts on this question. With the PIDCMD_GET_PIDFD command in
> place, we have two different kinds of file descriptors for processes,
> one derived from procfs and one that's independent. The former works
> with openat(2). The latter does not. To be very specific; if I'm
> writing a function that accepts a pidfd and I get a pidfd that comes
> from PIDCMD_GET_PIDFD, how am I supposed to get the equivalent of
> smaps or oom_score_adj or statm for the named process in a race-free
> manner?
> 

Task metadata could be exposed via "pages" identified by offset:

struct pidfd_stats stats;

pread(pidfd, &stats, sizeof(stats), PIDFD_STATS_OFFSET);

I'm not sure that we need yet another binary procfs.
But it will be faster than current text-based for sure.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists