[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a224821a-6e28-cea5-9928-440f5e132460@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 09:33:01 +0530
From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, andy.gross@...aro.org
Cc: david.brown@...aro.org, mark.rutland@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] soc: qcom: rpmpd: fixup rpmpd set performance
state
On 3/24/2019 11:19 PM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Fixup rpmpd state to max if the required state is greater than all the
> supported states.
This should also say why, 'so the clients which just want to vote on whatever
is the max state supported can do so by passing an INT_MAX'?
>
> Fixes: 075d3db8d10d ("Add support for the .set_performace_state() and
> .opp_to_performance_state()")
>
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> index 005326050c23..235d01870dd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/rpmpd.c
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int rpmpd_set_performance(struct generic_pm_domain *domain,
> struct rpmpd *pd = domain_to_rpmpd(domain);
>
> if (state > MAX_RPMPD_STATE)
> - goto out;
> + state = MAX_RPMPD_STATE;
>
> mutex_lock(&rpmpd_lock);
>
>
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists