lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 14:27:30 -0400 From: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] powercap/intel_rapl: Simplify rapl_find_package() On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 2:07 PM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 01:20:05AM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > > -static struct rapl_package *find_package_by_id(int id) > > +static struct rapl_package *rapl_find_package(int cpu) > > { > > + int id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu); > > struct rapl_package *rp; > > Which you'll change to topology_physical_die_id() in the next patch. > > If you respin the series again, could we pick a better name? Done. I called this routine "rapl_find_package_domain()" -- since that is what it does -- it finds what RAPL calls a "Package Domain", no matter if that domain is implemented in the topology by a die or a physical package. thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists