[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrW43Syz-deM-fGUCbWfA8tcsoCJJ5XqjFhpg+d0sNYDRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:55:39 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V31 10/25] PCI: Lock down BAR access when the kernel is
locked down
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:28 AM Matthew Garrett
<matthewgarrett@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
>
> Any hardware that can potentially generate DMA has to be locked down in
> order to avoid it being possible for an attacker to modify kernel code,
> allowing them to circumvent disabled module loading or module signing.
> Default to paranoid - in future we can potentially relax this for
> sufficiently IOMMU-isolated devices.
Does this break vfio?
--Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists