linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/14] x86/hpet: Expose more functions to read and write registers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903262156070.1789@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:00:24 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Andi Kleen <andi.kleen@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/14] x86/hpet: Expose more functions to read
 and write registers

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Ricardo Neri wrote:
>  struct irq_data;
> @@ -109,6 +114,11 @@ extern void hpet_unregister_irq_handler(rtc_irq_handler handler);
>  static inline int hpet_enable(void) { return 0; }
>  static inline int is_hpet_enabled(void) { return 0; }
>  #define hpet_readl(a) 0
> +#define hpet_writel(d, a)

What for?

> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +#define hpet_readq(a) 0
> +#define hpet_writeq(d, a)
> +#endif

Ditto.

There are no users outside of HPET and your new HPET watchdog code for
those. And both are not compiled when CONFIG_HPET=n.

The only reason to have the hpet_readl() define, which btw. should be an
inline, is to avoid massive ifdeffery in the TSC calibration code.

Thanks,

	tglx