linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] gpio: use new gpio_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190326220403.63e0b533@windsurf>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:04:03 +0100
From:   Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jan Kundrát <jan.kundrat@...net.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] gpio: use new gpio_set_config() helper in more
 places

Hello Guenter,

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:03:02 -0700
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:

> > I'll have a look. In the mean time, I'm fine with the patch being
> > reverted.
> 
> The problem is still seen in the latest kernel as of last night, and
> I did not see any further activities. Should I send a revert request ?

Sorry for not replying. I have not had the chance to investigate this
further due to lack of time. Linus Walleij initially suggested to use
gpio_set_config() in more places, but that doesn't to work as expected.

A revert patch has already been sent:

  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190326044954.18671-1-andrew@aj.id.au/

Best regards,

Thomas Petazzoni
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com