| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20190326223938.5365-3-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:39:36 -0500
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, rjw@...ysocki.net,
lenb@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, sudeep.holla@....com,
james.morse@....com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
linuxarm@...wei.com, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ACPI/PPTT: Modify node flag detection to find last IDENTICAL
The ACPI specification implies that the IDENTICAL flag should be
set on all non leaf nodes where the children are identical.
This means that we need to be searching for the last node with
the identical flag set rather than the first one.
To achieve this with the existing code we need to pass a
function through the tree traversal logic so we can check
the next node to assure that IDENTICAL isn't set before returning
a node with IDENTICAL set.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
---
drivers/acpi/pptt.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
index 472c95ec816b..db18510346f9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
@@ -432,17 +432,51 @@ static void cache_setup_acpi_cpu(struct acpi_table_header *table,
}
}
+
+typedef bool (*node_check)(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+ struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu);
+static bool flag_package(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+ struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu)
+{
+ return cpu->flags & ACPI_PPTT_PHYSICAL_PACKAGE;
+}
+
+static bool flag_identical(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+ struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu)
+{
+ struct acpi_pptt_processor *next;
+
+ /* heterogeneous machines must use PPTT revision > 1 */
+ if (table_hdr->revision < 2)
+ return false;
+
+ /* Locate the last node in the tree with IDENTICAL set */
+ if (cpu->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL) {
+ next = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent);
+ if (!(next && next->flags & ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool flag_none(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+ struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu)
+{
+ return false;
+}
+
/* Passing level values greater than this will result in search termination */
#define PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE 0xFF
-static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_package_id(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
- struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu,
- int level, int flag)
+static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_tag_id(struct acpi_table_header *table_hdr,
+ struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu,
+ int level, node_check chk)
{
struct acpi_pptt_processor *prev_node;
while (cpu && level) {
- if (cpu->flags & flag)
+ if (chk(table_hdr, cpu))
break;
pr_debug("level %d\n", level);
prev_node = fetch_pptt_node(table_hdr, cpu->parent);
@@ -473,15 +507,15 @@ static void acpi_pptt_warn_missing(void)
* Return: Unique value, or -ENOENT if unable to locate cpu
*/
static int topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(struct acpi_table_header *table,
- unsigned int cpu, int level, int flag)
+ unsigned int cpu, int level, node_check chk)
{
struct acpi_pptt_processor *cpu_node;
u32 acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_node(table, acpi_cpu_id);
if (cpu_node) {
- cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_package_id(table, cpu_node,
- level, flag);
+ cpu_node = acpi_find_processor_tag_id(table, cpu_node,
+ level, chk);
/*
* As per specification if the processor structure represents
* an actual processor, then ACPI processor ID must be valid.
@@ -498,7 +532,7 @@ static int topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(struct acpi_table_header *table,
return -ENOENT;
}
-static int find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(unsigned int cpu, int level, int flag)
+static int find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(unsigned int cpu, int level, node_check chk)
{
struct acpi_table_header *table;
acpi_status status;
@@ -509,7 +543,7 @@ static int find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(unsigned int cpu, int level, int flag)
acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
return -ENOENT;
}
- retval = topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(table, cpu, level, flag);
+ retval = topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(table, cpu, level, chk);
pr_debug("Topology Setup ACPI cpu %d, level %d ret = %d\n",
cpu, level, retval);
acpi_put_table(table);
@@ -601,7 +635,7 @@ int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu)
*/
int find_acpi_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
{
- return find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(cpu, level, 0);
+ return find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(cpu, level, flag_none);
}
/**
@@ -658,7 +692,7 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu)
{
return find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(cpu, PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE,
- ACPI_PPTT_PHYSICAL_PACKAGE);
+ flag_package);
}
/**
@@ -674,8 +708,8 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu)
*
* The returned ID can be used to group peers with identical implementation.
*
- * The search terminates when a level is found with the identical implementation
- * flag set or we reach a root node.
+ * The search terminates when a level is found without the identical
+ * implementation flag set following a node with it set, or we reach the root.
*
* Return: -ENOENT if the PPTT doesn't exist, or the cpu cannot be found.
* Otherwise returns a value which represents a group of identical cores
@@ -684,5 +718,5 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(unsigned int cpu)
int find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(unsigned int cpu)
{
return find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(cpu, PPTT_ABORT_PACKAGE,
- ACPI_PPTT_ACPI_IDENTICAL);
+ flag_identical);
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists