[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190326231314.19518-17-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:13:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/18] rcu: Fix typo in tree_exp.h comment
This commit changes a rcu_exp_handler() comment from rcu_preempt_defer_qs()
to rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() in order to better match reality.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 4c2a0189e748..ec4fb93a5dbe 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
*
* If the CPU is fully enabled (or if some buggy RCU-preempt
* read-side critical section is being used from idle), just
- * invoke rcu_preempt_defer_qs() to immediately report the
+ * invoke rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() to immediately report the
* quiescent state. We cannot use rcu_read_unlock_special()
* because we are in an interrupt handler, which will cause that
* function to take an early exit without doing anything.
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists