lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190326232225.21332-5-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:22:19 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/11] rcu: Move rcu_print_task_exp_stall() to tree_exp.h

Because expedited CPU stall warnings are contained within the
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h file, rcu_print_task_exp_stall() should live
there too.  This commit carries out the required code motion.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h    | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 31 -------------------------------
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 4c2a0189e748..7be3e085ddd6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 
 static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused);
+static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp);
 
 /*
  * Record the start of an expedited grace period.
@@ -670,6 +671,27 @@ static void sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(int cpu)
 {
 }
 
+/*
+ * Scan the current list of tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical
+ * sections, printing out the tid of each that is blocking the current
+ * expedited grace period.
+ */
+static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	struct task_struct *t;
+	int ndetected = 0;
+
+	if (!rnp->exp_tasks)
+		return 0;
+	t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
+		       struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
+	list_for_each_entry_continue(t, &rnp->blkd_tasks, rcu_node_entry) {
+		pr_cont(" P%d", t->pid);
+		ndetected++;
+	}
+	return ndetected;
+}
+
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
 
 /* Invoked on each online non-idle CPU for expedited quiescent state. */
@@ -709,6 +731,16 @@ static void sync_sched_exp_online_cleanup(int cpu)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
+ * tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical sections that are
+ * blocking the current expedited grace period.
+ */
+static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU */
 
 /**
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 7fa3bc4d481b..72519c57f656 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -642,27 +642,6 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
 	rcu_preempt_deferred_qs_irqrestore(t, flags);
 }
 
-/*
- * Scan the current list of tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical
- * sections, printing out the tid of each that is blocking the current
- * expedited grace period.
- */
-static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	struct task_struct *t;
-	int ndetected = 0;
-
-	if (!rnp->exp_tasks)
-		return 0;
-	t = list_entry(rnp->exp_tasks->prev,
-		       struct task_struct, rcu_node_entry);
-	list_for_each_entry_continue(t, &rnp->blkd_tasks, rcu_node_entry) {
-		pr_cont(" P%d", t->pid);
-		ndetected++;
-	}
-	return ndetected;
-}
-
 /*
  * Check that the list of blocked tasks for the newly completed grace
  * period is in fact empty.  It is a serious bug to complete a grace
@@ -906,16 +885,6 @@ static bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
 }
 static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t) { }
 
-/*
- * Because preemptible RCU does not exist, we never have to check for
- * tasks blocked within RCU read-side critical sections that are
- * blocking the current expedited grace period.
- */
-static int rcu_print_task_exp_stall(struct rcu_node *rnp)
-{
-	return 0;
-}
-
 /*
  * Because there is no preemptible RCU, there can be no readers blocked,
  * so there is no need to check for blocked tasks.  So check only for
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ