[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190326233118.23057-3-paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:31:12 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/9] rcutorture: Make rcutorture_extend_mask() comment match the code
The code actually rarely uses more than one type of RCU read-side
protection, as is actually desired given that we need some reasonable
probability of preempting RCU read-side critical sections, which cannot
happen with multiple types of protection. This comment therefore adjusts
the comment.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index f14d1b18a74f..2453229ba15a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ rcutorture_extend_mask(int oldmask, struct torture_random_state *trsp)
unsigned long randmask2 = randmask1 >> 3;
WARN_ON_ONCE(mask >> RCUTORTURE_RDR_SHIFT);
- /* Most of the time lots of bits, half the time only one bit. */
+ /* Mostly only one bit (need preemption!), sometimes lots of bits. */
if (!(randmask1 & 0x7))
mask = mask & randmask2;
else
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists