linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 22/30] arm64: traps: disable irq in die()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190326042608.316746710@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 15:30:01 +0900
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Qiao Zhou <qiaozhou@...micro.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 22/30] arm64: traps: disable irq in die()

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Qiao Zhou <qiaozhou@...micro.com>

commit 6f44a0bacb79a03972c83759711832b382b1b8ac upstream.

In current die(), the irq is disabled for __die() handle, not
including the possible panic() handling. Since the log in __die()
can take several hundreds ms, new irq might come and interrupt
current die().

If the process calling die() holds some critical resource, and some
other process scheduled later also needs it, then it would deadlock.
The first panic will not be executed.

So here disable irq for the whole flow of die().

Signed-off-by: Qiao Zhou <qiaozhou@...micro.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c |    8 ++++++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c
@@ -266,10 +266,12 @@ void die(const char *str, struct pt_regs
 {
 	struct thread_info *thread = current_thread_info();
 	int ret;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&die_lock, flags);
 
 	oops_enter();
 
-	raw_spin_lock_irq(&die_lock);
 	console_verbose();
 	bust_spinlocks(1);
 	ret = __die(str, err, thread, regs);
@@ -279,13 +281,15 @@ void die(const char *str, struct pt_regs
 
 	bust_spinlocks(0);
 	add_taint(TAINT_DIE, LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE);
-	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&die_lock);
 	oops_exit();
 
 	if (in_interrupt())
 		panic("Fatal exception in interrupt");
 	if (panic_on_oops)
 		panic("Fatal exception");
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&die_lock, flags);
+
 	if (ret != NOTIFY_STOP)
 		do_exit(SIGSEGV);
 }