linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 00/12] x86: Enable FSGSBASE instructions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:43:54 -0700
From:   Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To:     "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 00/12] x86: Enable FSGSBASE instructions

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 1:07 PM Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Updates from v5 [5]:
> * Drop the new tain flag (TAINT_INSECURE)
> * Cleanup copy_thread_tls(), some changelog, and unnecessary comments on
>   assembly macros
> * Rearrange some helper updates appropriately (from patch 4 to 6)

I think this stuff is in generally decent shape, but I have two big
broad comments:

What's the status of the stuff hpa was working on to make the behavior
of modify_ldt() predictable?

Can we please have a test case that explicitly exercises the way that
ptrace reads and writes the base registers?