[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190326004351.GA26712@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:43:51 +0900
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
acpi4asus-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/27] debugfs: Restrict debugfs when the kernel is
locked down
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:38:09PM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:35 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 03:09:52PM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > Normal device interaction should be done through configfs, sysfs or a
> > > miscdev, not debugfs.
> >
> > Then why not just not allow debugfs at all if it is such a "big
> > problem"?
>
> Previous attempts to do so have resulted in strong pushback from
> various maintainers. If you're happy just having any complaints
> reassigned to you then I'm more than happy to turn it off entirely.
Sure, send them my way :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists