[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190326075651.GB1867@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:56:51 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@....com>
Cc: "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"rafal@...ecki.pl" <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
"clemej@...il.com" <clemej@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] x86/MCE: Add function to allow filtering of MCA
errors
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 04:34:22PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
>
> Some systems may report spurious MCA errors. In general, spurious MCA
> errors may be disabled by clearing a particular bit in MCA_CTL. However,
> clearing a bit in MCA_CTL may not be recommended for some errors, so the
> only option is to ignore them.
>
> An MCA error is printed and handled after it has been added to the MCE
> event pool. So an MCA error can be ignored by not adding it to the pool.
>
> Define a default function that does not filter any errors.
>
> Check if an MCA error should be filtered out when adding it to the MCE
> event pool.
>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.0.x
The old version of the patches had 4.14.x here as a kernel version. Why
change?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists