[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d278ffa-79f8-6497-448f-0f53f7bee6df@st.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:07:36 +0000
From: Mickael GUENE <mickael.guene@...com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@...sulko.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ben Kao <ben.kao@...el.com>,
Todor Tomov <todor.tomov@...aro.org>,
Rui Miguel Silva <rui.silva@...aro.org>,
"Akinobu Mita" <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
"Jason Chen" <jasonx.z.chen@...el.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Tianshu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] media:st-mipid02: MIPID02 CSI-2 to PARALLEL bridge
driver
Hello Sakari,
On 3/26/19 12:37, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:14:05PM +0000, Mickael GUENE wrote:
>> Hi Sakari,
>>
>> On 3/25/19 12:17, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> Hi Mickael,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 09:57:44AM +0000, Mickael GUENE wrote:
>>>> Hi Sakari,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your review. Find my comments below.
>>>>
>>>> On 3/16/19 23:14, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>>> +static struct v4l2_subdev *mipid02_find_sensor(struct mipid02_dev *bridge)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct media_device *mdev = bridge->sd.v4l2_dev->mdev;
>>>>>> + struct media_entity *entity;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (!mdev)
>>>>>> + return NULL;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + media_device_for_each_entity(entity, mdev)
>>>>>> + if (entity->function == MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR)
>>>>>> + return media_entity_to_v4l2_subdev(entity);
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm. Could you instead use the link state to determine which of the
>>>>> receivers is active? You'll need one more pad, and then you'd had 1:1
>>>>> mapping between ports and pads.
>>>>>
>>>> Goal here is not to detect which of the receivers is active but to find
>>>> sensor in case there are others sub-dev in chain (for example a
>>>> serializer/deserializer as found in cars).
>>>
>>> You shouldn't make assumptions on the rest of the pipeline beyond the
>>> device that's directly connected. You might not even have a camera there.
>>>
>> I have also seen your answer to '[PATCH v2 2/2] media:st-mipid02: MIPID02 CSI-2 to PARALLEL bridge driver'
>> concerning support of set_fmt, get_fmt and link_validate.
>> My initial idea was to avoid to avoid to implement them and to avoid media ctrl configuration. According
>> to your remark is seems a bad idea. Right ?
>
> Yes, you'll need them. This is how the media controller pipeline works: a
> driver for a given device is generally only aware of its direct links and
> generally only communicate with drivers for devices directly connected to
> them.
>
>> In that case I have to also implement enum_mbus_code ?
>
> Yes, please.
>
Ok I will add it in v4
>> I will drop this code and use connected device only to get link speed.
>
> Ack.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists