[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903261340030.1789@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 13:40:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
cc: "jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com" <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Svahn, Kai" <kai.svahn@...el.com>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"josh@...htriplett.org" <josh@...htriplett.org>,
"suresh.b.siddha@...el.com" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"Ayoun, Serge" <serge.ayoun@...el.com>,
"Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"npmccallum@...hat.com" <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"Katz-zamir, Shay" <shay.katz-zamir@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19,RESEND 16/27] x86/sgx: Add the Linux SGX Enclave
Driver
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-03-20 at 18:21 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > 13 files changed, 1657 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/sgx.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/Makefile
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/driver.h
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/ioctl.c
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver/main.c
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c
> > create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h
>
> Shouldn't the driver be located somewhere under drivers/, but not under arch/x86?
>
> I don't think x86 maintainers should have the burden to review every code
> change made to SGX driver?
I rather prefer to have it in x86. Why? Because driver code has a tendency
to get under the radar.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists