[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190326013858.GU2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:38:58 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: syzbot <syzbot+7a8ba368b47fdefca61e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: ceph: fix use-after-free on symlink traversal
free the symlink body after the same RCU delay we have for freeing the
struct inode itself, so that traversal during RCU pathwalk wouldn't step
into freed memory.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c
index e3346628efe2..2d61ddda9bf5 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c
@@ -524,6 +524,7 @@ static void ceph_i_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
struct inode *inode = container_of(head, struct inode, i_rcu);
struct ceph_inode_info *ci = ceph_inode(inode);
+ kfree(ci->i_symlink);
kmem_cache_free(ceph_inode_cachep, ci);
}
@@ -566,7 +567,6 @@ void ceph_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
}
}
- kfree(ci->i_symlink);
while ((n = rb_first(&ci->i_fragtree)) != NULL) {
frag = rb_entry(n, struct ceph_inode_frag, node);
rb_erase(n, &ci->i_fragtree);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists