linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903261717160.1789@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:17:43 +0100 (CET)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
cc:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/syscalls: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 17:09:44 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> 
> > > >  1) The third argument of get/set(), i.e. the argument offset, is 0 on all
> > > >     call sites. Do we need it at all?  
> > > 
> > > Probably "maxargs" can be removed too, Steven sent the patches a long ago, see
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20161107212634.529267342@goodmis.org/  
> > 
> > Indeed. We should resurrect them.
> > 
> > > >  2) syscall_set_arguments() has been introduced in 2008 and we still have
> > > >     no caller. Instead of polishing it, can it be removed completely or are
> > > >     there plans to actually use it?  
> > > 
> > > I think it can die.  
> > 
> > Good. Removed code is the least buggy code :)
> > 
> > Gustavo, it would be really appreciated if you could take care of that,
> > unless Steven wants to polish his old set up himself. If you have no
> > cycles, please let us know.
> 
> I still have those patches in my quilt queue. I can polish them up and
> resend.

Appreciated.