[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190327111549.32911fa7@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:15:49 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
oss-drivers@...ronome.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 234/262] nfp: flower: tidy
tunnel related private data
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:01:29 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit f3b975778c176b01eba10f869a5a64c6b8550c23 ]
>
> Recent additions to the flower app private data have grouped the variables
> of a given feature into a struct and added that struct to the main private
> data struct.
>
> In keeping with this, move all tunnel related private data to their own
> struct. This has no affect on functionality but improves readability and
> maintenance of the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Not a fix.
Is there a way to request patches under drivers/net/ethernet/netronome
to only be considered if they have an explicit Fixes tag?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists