[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVDDf4dj3Md1Nxc5P_NCToXGnAbEO3bGfwgKSfeVmU4Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:29:14 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@...gle.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V31 25/25] debugfs: Disable open() when kernel is locked down
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:31 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:20:24PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:28 AM Matthew Garrett
> > <matthewgarrett@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...gle.com>
> > >
> > > debugfs has not been meaningfully audited in terms of ensuring that
> > > userland cannot trample over the kernel. At Greg's request, disable
> > > access to it entirely when the kernel is locked down. This is done at
> > > open() time rather than init time as the kernel lockdown status may be
> > > made stricter at runtime.
> >
> > Ugh. Some of those files are very useful. Could this perhaps still
> > allow O_RDONLY if we're in INTEGRITY mode?
>
> Useful for what? Debugging, sure, but for "normal operation", no kernel
> functionality should ever require debugfs. If it does, that's a bug and
> should be fixed.
>
I semi-regularly read files in debugfs to diagnose things, and I think
it would be good for this to work on distro kernels.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists