linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 06/63] sysctl: handle overflow for file-max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190327182323.18577-6-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:22:26 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 06/63] sysctl: handle overflow for file-max

From: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>

[ Upstream commit 32a5ad9c22852e6bd9e74bdec5934ef9d1480bc5 ]

Currently, when writing

  echo 18446744073709551616 > /proc/sys/fs/file-max

/proc/sys/fs/file-max will overflow and be set to 0.  That quickly
crashes the system.

This commit sets the max and min value for file-max.  The max value is
set to long int.  Any higher value cannot currently be used as the
percpu counters are long ints and not unsigned integers.

Note that the file-max value is ultimately parsed via
__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax().  This function does not report error when
min or max are exceeded.  Which means if a value largen that long int is
written userspace will not receive an error instead the old value will be
kept.  There is an argument to be made that this should be changed and
__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax() should return an error when a dedicated min
or max value are exceeded.  However this has the potential to break
userspace so let's defer this to an RFC patch.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190107222700.15954-3-christian@brauner.io
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
[christian@...uner.io: v4]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190210203943.8227-3-christian@brauner.io
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sysctl.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c
index beadcf83ceba..2f98b11477b8 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
@@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused one = 1;
 static int __maybe_unused two = 2;
 static int __maybe_unused four = 4;
 static unsigned long one_ul = 1;
+static unsigned long long_max = LONG_MAX;
 static int one_hundred = 100;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
 static int ten_thousand = 10000;
@@ -1603,6 +1604,8 @@ static struct ctl_table fs_table[] = {
 		.maxlen		= sizeof(files_stat.max_files),
 		.mode		= 0644,
 		.proc_handler	= proc_doulongvec_minmax,
+		.extra1		= &zero,
+		.extra2		= &long_max,
 	},
 	{
 		.procname	= "nr_open",
-- 
2.19.1