[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190327151538.2ca6ac83@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:15:38 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Ronald Tschalär <ronald@...ovation.ch>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...math.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Federico Lorenzi <federico@...velground.com>,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Input: add Apple SPI keyboard and trackpad
driver.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:45:26 +0100
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > According to last changes this should be GPL-2.0-only
>
> What "last changes"? "GPL-2.0" is a totally valid SPDX identifier for
> the kernel. Don't buy into the "-only" prefix crud that the newer SPDX
> version adopted for crazy reasons. The in-kernel documentation lists
> the valid identifiers and the version of SPDX we are currently using.
According to: LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0
> SPDX-URL: https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0.html
> Usage-Guide:
> To use this license in source code, put one of the following SPDX
> tag/value pairs into a comment according to the placement
> guidelines in the licensing rules documentation.
> For 'GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 only' use:
> SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> or
> SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> For 'GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 or any later version' use:
> SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> or
> SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
So, GPL-2.0 is the same as GPL-2.0-only. Changing it from one to the
other doesn't make any difference.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists