[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c80863a8-8ffa-473d-7c5c-3172cb8045de@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:18:51 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@....com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] iommu: Add config option to set lazy mode as
default
On 27/03/2019 15:00, Zhen Lei wrote:
> This allows the default behaviour to be controlled by a kernel config
> option instead of changing the command line for the kernel to include
> "iommu.strict=0" on ARM64 where this is desired.
>
> This is similar to CONFIG_IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH.
>
> Note: At present, intel_iommu, amd_iommu and s390_iommu use lazy mode as
> default, so there is no need to add code for them.
That seems a bit self-contradictory - if there's a real need for TLB
flush behaviour to be statically configurable and not command-line-based
then why should users of other architectures be exempt?
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> index 6f07f3b21816c64..5daa110d0e83a07 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
> @@ -85,6 +85,20 @@ config IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH
>
> If unsure, say N here.
>
> +config IOMMU_DMA_DEFAULT_LAZY_MODE
> + bool "IOMMU DMA use lazy mode to flush IOTLB and free IOVA"
> + depends on IOMMU_API
> + help
> + Support lazy mode, where for every IOMMU DMA unmap operation, the
> + flush operation of IOTLB and the free operation of IOVA are deferred.
> + They are only guaranteed to be done before the related IOVA will be
> + reused. Removing the need to pass in kernel parameters through
> + command line. For example, iommu.strict=0 on ARM64. If this is
> + enabled, you can still disable with kernel parameters, such as
> + iommu.strict=1 depending on the architecture.
> +
> + If unsure, say N here.
> +
> config OF_IOMMU
> def_bool y
> depends on OF && IOMMU_API
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index 33a982e33716369..5acb98e79b5b32d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -43,7 +43,12 @@
> #else
> static unsigned int iommu_def_domain_type = IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA;
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_DMA_DEFAULT_LAZY_MODE
> +static bool iommu_dma_strict __read_mostly;
> +#else
> static bool iommu_dma_strict __read_mostly = true;
> +#endif
For a straightforward boolean, you can simply do:
static bool foo = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO);
but that said, I'm still not particularly convinced that there are a
significant number of users in a position to build and install a custom
kernel but not edit /etc/default/grub, and who really value the
combination of less performance than passthrough with less isolation
than strict.
It's also not necessarily obvious to the user how this interacts with
IOMMU_DEFAULT_PASSTHROUGH, so if we really do go down this route, maybe
it would be better to refactor the whole lot into a single selection of
something like IOMMU_DEFAULT_MODE anyway.
Robin.
>
> struct iommu_callback_data {
> const struct iommu_ops *ops;
> --
> 1.8.3
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists