linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 101/262] loop: set GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190327180158.10245-101-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:59:16 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.0 101/262] loop: set GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part()

From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>

[ Upstream commit 758a58d0bc67457f1215321a536226654a830eeb ]

Commit 0da03cab87e6
("loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()") moves
blkdev_reread_part() out of the loop_ctl_mutex. However,
GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN is set before __blkdev_reread_part(). As a result,
__blkdev_reread_part() will fail the check of GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN and
will not rescan the loop device to delete all partitions.

Below are steps to reproduce the issue:

step1 # dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.raw bs=1M count=100
step2 # losetup -P /dev/loop0 tmp.raw
step3 # parted /dev/loop0 mklabel gpt
step4 # parted -a none -s /dev/loop0 mkpart primary 64s 1
step5 # losetup -d /dev/loop0

Step5 will not be able to delete /dev/loop0p1 (introduced by step4) and
there is below kernel warning message:

[  464.414043] __loop_clr_fd: partition scan of loop0 failed (rc=-22)

This patch sets GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN after blkdev_reread_part().

Fixes: 0da03cab87e6 ("loop: Fix deadlock when calling blkdev_reread_part()")
Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/block/loop.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index cf5538942834..23aa2e9b3be0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1089,16 +1089,12 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
 		kobject_uevent(&disk_to_dev(bdev->bd_disk)->kobj, KOBJ_CHANGE);
 	}
 	mapping_set_gfp_mask(filp->f_mapping, gfp);
-	lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
 	/* This is safe: open() is still holding a reference. */
 	module_put(THIS_MODULE);
 	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
 
 	partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN && bdev;
 	lo_number = lo->lo_number;
-	lo->lo_flags = 0;
-	if (!part_shift)
-		lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
 	loop_unprepare_queue(lo);
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
@@ -1120,6 +1116,23 @@ static int __loop_clr_fd(struct loop_device *lo, bool release)
 		/* Device is gone, no point in returning error */
 		err = 0;
 	}
+
+	/*
+	 * lo->lo_state is set to Lo_unbound here after above partscan has
+	 * finished.
+	 *
+	 * There cannot be anybody else entering __loop_clr_fd() as
+	 * lo->lo_backing_file is already cleared and Lo_rundown state
+	 * protects us from all the other places trying to change the 'lo'
+	 * device.
+	 */
+	mutex_lock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+	lo->lo_flags = 0;
+	if (!part_shift)
+		lo->lo_disk->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
+	lo->lo_state = Lo_unbound;
+	mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+
 	/*
 	 * Need not hold loop_ctl_mutex to fput backing file.
 	 * Calling fput holding loop_ctl_mutex triggers a circular
-- 
2.19.1