[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190328073125.0e5a5668@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 07:31:25 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the at91 tree
Hi all,
Commits
080eb452bdc8 ("ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2_xplained: Add proper regulator states for suspend-to-mem")
2802bac0b675 ("ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: add labels to soc dtsi for derivative boards")
0c0fccec0545 ("ARM: at91: pm: do not disable/enable PLLA for ULP modes")
9e35b518b8b2 ("ARM: at91: pm: disable RC oscillator in ULP0")
1b86244a4d5e ("ARM: at91: pm: add ULP1 support for SAM9X60")
0017bace228b ("ARM: at91: pm: add support for per SoC wakeup source configuration")
3201145a666b ("ARM: at91: pm: keep at91_pm_backup_init() only for SAMA5D2 SoCs")
24c2ac08869b ("ARM: at91: pm: initial PM support for SAM9X60")
0b072b0e1bd6 ("dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add binding for SAM9X60 SoC")
783d37b06ad4 ("ARM: at91: pm: introduce at91_soc_pm structure")
are missing a Signed-off-by from their committers.
Rebasing will do that ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists