linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH ghak10 v6 0/2] audit: Log changes that can affect the system clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:36:29 -0700
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc:     Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@...hat.com>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-audit@...hat.com,
        Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>,
        Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH ghak10 v6 0/2] audit: Log changes that can affect the
 system clock

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 7:50 AM Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com> wrote:
> These patches look fine to me, but it would be really nice to get an
> ACK from the time folks before I merge this into audit/next.  Time
> folks, I know you've looked at previous versions of this patchset, can
> you give this a quick look to make sure everything is still okay from
> your perspective?
>

Sorry for the slow response.  I briefly looked it over and it seems
simple enough, so don't really have any objections. Though I don't
have as sharp an eye (or opinion :) as Thomas, so no promises he won't
step in with an issue.

I do want to make sure folks are careful with future changes to
audit_log(), but that's my usual hand-wringing.

thanks
-john