linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 06/25] drm/mediatek: redefine mtk_ddp_sout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1553667561-25447-7-git-send-email-yongqiang.niu@mediatek.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:19:02 +0800
From:   <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
To:     <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     <airlied@...ux.ie>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <Bibby.Hsieh@...iatek.com>,
        <yt.shen@...iatek.com>, Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/25] drm/mediatek: redefine mtk_ddp_sout_sel

From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>

the format of "mtk_ddp_sout_sel"was not flexible, after we add more
mediatek SOC support, that will be redundant

Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
index 80dc91f..e4dafe0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
@@ -391,20 +391,26 @@ static unsigned int mtk_ddp_sel_in(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
 	return value;
 }
 
-static void mtk_ddp_sout_sel(void __iomem *config_regs,
-			     enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
-			     enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next)
+static unsigned int mtk_ddp_sout_sel(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
+				     enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next,
+				     unsigned int *addr)
 {
+        unsigned int value;
+
 	if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0) {
-		writel_relaxed(BLS_TO_DSI_RDMA1_TO_DPI1,
-			       config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL);
+		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL;
+                value = BLS_TO_DSI_RDMA1_TO_DPI1;
 	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_BLS && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0) {
-		writel_relaxed(BLS_TO_DPI_RDMA1_TO_DSI,
-			       config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL);
+		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_OUT_SEL;
+                value = BLS_TO_DPI_RDMA1_TO_DSI;
 	} else if (cur == DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1 && next == DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0) {
-		writel_relaxed(DSI_SEL_IN_RDMA,
-			       config_regs + DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL);
+		*addr = DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL;
+		value = DSI_SEL_IN_RDMA;
+	} else {
+		value = 0;
 	}
+
+        return value;
 }
 
 void mtk_ddp_add_comp_to_path(void __iomem *config_regs,
@@ -419,7 +425,9 @@ void mtk_ddp_add_comp_to_path(void __iomem *config_regs,
 		writel_relaxed(reg, config_regs + addr);
 	}
 
-	mtk_ddp_sout_sel(config_regs, cur, next);
+	value = mtk_ddp_sout_sel(cur, next, &addr);
+	if (value)
+                writel_relaxed(value, config_regs + addr);
 
 	value = mtk_ddp_sel_in(cur, next, &addr);
 	if (value) {
-- 
1.8.1.1.dirty