[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190327075441.GA29894@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:54:41 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] RISC-V: Allow booting kernel from any 4KB aligned
address
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 09:46:59PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> > Why do you even care about kernel mappings for non-existant ram.
>
> We care because there will always be some buggy kernel driver/code going
> out-of-bound and accessing non-existent RAM. If we by default map all
> possible kernel virtual address then behaviour of buggy accesses will be
> unpredictable.
>
> Further, I think we should also make .text and .rodata sections of kernel
> as read-only. This will protect kernel code and rodata.
All of that is useful at the final_setup_vm() time - but none of it
matters during early setup_vm where life is complicated.
Mike suggested on the previous iteration that you only do smaller
mappings when setting up the final mapping to avoid the ops churn,
and I fully agree with him.
So I would suggest we avoid complicated the fiddly early boot changes
that just add complxity, and you instead redirect your efforts to
say implemented proper ro and non-executable sections using 4k mappings
in the final VM setup only. That should actuall lead to less code
and complexity, and provide more benefits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists