[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZCb=rZMdBYyYCSCQ3Dba5Nk43BvV6whHx-vNPmox-OOSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 10:51:22 +0200
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>, Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"S.j. Wang" <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Teo Hall <teo.hall@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: Add EDMA0/EDMA1 nodes
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:31 PM Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com> wrote:
>
> > From: Daniel Baluta
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 5:43 PM
> >
> > i.MX8QXP contains a total of 4 EDMA controllers of which two are primarily
> > for audio components and the other two are for non-audio periperhals.
> >
> > This patch adds the EDMA0/EDMA1 nodes used by audio peripherals.
> >
> > EDMA0 contains channels for:
> > * ASRC0
> > * ESAI0
> > * SPDIF0
> > * SAI0, SAI1, SAI2, SAI3
> >
> > EDMA1 contains channels for:
> > * ASRC1
> > * SAI4, SAI5
> >
> > See chapter Audio DMA Memory Maps (2.2.3) from i.MX8QXP RM [1]
> >
> > This patch is based on the dtsi file initially submitted by Teo Hall in i.MX NXP
> > internal tree.
> >
> > [1] https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/IMX8DQXPRM.pdf
> >
> > Cc: Teo Hall <teo.hall@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi | 72
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > index 0cb939861a60..9e959deb2499 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8qxp.dtsi
> > @@ -182,6 +182,78 @@
> > #clock-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > + edma0: dma-controller@...f0000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,imx8qm-edma";
Thanks for the comment Aisheng!
>
> Should this be "fsl,imx8qxp-edma"?
Yes, I think that's the more clear approach although in
our internal tree the edma driver uses only the "fsl,imx8qm-edma
compatible.
I will go with your suggestion.
> or
> "fsl,imx8qxp-edma", "fsl,imx8qm-edma"?
One thing that it is not clear for me is why there are places
where we use two compatible strings?
I understand the situation where are two distinct drivers, but is there
any other reason to add multiple compatible strings for a node in dts?
thanks,
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists