linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next v1] x86/apic: Reduce print level of CPU limit announcement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190327101815.GB32571@zn.tnic>
Date:   Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:18:15 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        linux-pm <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v1] x86/apic: Reduce print level of CPU limit
 announcement

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 12:11:33PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> ok, I tested your variant and it still prints a t least on my systems,

Probably because your loglevel is set to debug. And no, we don't want to
have to enable some config option in order to see this.

Also, the ugly linebreak needs to go.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.