linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190327115745.GA11404@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 27 Mar 2019 11:57:45 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Annaliese McDermond <nh6z@...z.net>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the sound-asoc tree

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 03:29:55PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> writes:

> > Hrm, seems PowerPC is still not using the common clock API - is there
> > any plan for that?  There are some ASoC PowerPC uses so it's going to be
> > a bit of an issue as we expand our use of the clock API.

> I don't know anything about the common clock API. What would it involve
> for powerpc to use it?

It's what's in drivers/clk - you'd have to provide clock drivers for all
the clocks that are current supported by arch-specific code, make sure
that those drivers can be instantiated and then remove the custom
implementation of the clock API in arch/powerpc in favour of those.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)