linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 01/11] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190328043013.GA3251@icarus>
Date:   Thu, 28 Mar 2019 13:30:13 +0900
From:   William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc:     linus.walleij@...aro.org, bgolaszewski@...libre.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
        yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        geert@...ux-m68k.org, preid@...ctromag.com.au,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/11] bitops: Introduce the for_each_set_clump8 macro

On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 07:42:54AM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 01:58:45PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > This macro iterates for each 8-bit group of bits (clump) with set bits,
> > within a bitmap memory region. For each iteration, "start" is set to the
> > bit offset of the found clump, while the respective clump value is
> > stored to the location pointed by "clump". Additionally, the
> > bitmap_get_value8 and bitmap_set_value8 functions are introduced to
> > respectively get and set an 8-bit value in a bitmap memory region.
> 
> I would have preferred static inlines for bitmap_get_value8(),
> bitmap_set_value8() and find_next_clump8() to make this as fast
> as possible in the callers because I've personally worked with
> an industrial application where the GPIO pins of a 74x164 are
> written every 250 usec.
> 
> But apart from that I like this series a lot, thanks for working on it.
> 
> Lukas

I'm not sure these can be static inline since the symbols are exported
for use outside this file. However, in theory I have no objection from a
performance standpoint. Since my devices don't have such strict realtime
requirements as your 74x164 application, I'll defer this decision to
someone more knowledgeable in this area; perhaps someone else can
comment in this thread with their advice and suggestions.

William Breathitt Gray