[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190328090938.GT9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 11:09:38 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/boot: Convert early_serial_base to unsigned
long
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 09:28:23AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 09:43:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > As a preparatory of adding flexible serial I/O accessors, convert
> > early_serial_base to unsigned long to cover all possible bus addresses
> > on the system.
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void parse_earlyprintk(void)
> > int baud = DEFAULT_BAUD;
> > char arg[32];
> > int pos = 0;
> > - int port = 0;
> > + unsigned long port = 0;
> >
> > if (cmdline_find_option("earlyprintk", arg, sizeof(arg)) > 0) {
> > char *e;
> > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static void parse_console_uart8250(void)
> > {
> > char optstr[64], *options;
> > int baud = DEFAULT_BAUD;
> > - int port = 0;
> > + unsigned long port = 0;
>
> Here and above:
Agree on above and will fix, but don't see how this different in the latter?
>
> Please sort function local variables declaration in a reverse christmas
> tree order:
>
> <type A> longest_variable_name;
> <type B> shorter_var_name;
> <type C> even_shorter;
> <type D> i;
>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists