| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1553736836.18612.12.camel@mtksdaap41>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 09:33:56 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
CC: <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <airlied@...ux.ie>,
<mark.rutland@....com>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <Bibby.Hsieh@...iatek.com>,
<yt.shen@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/25] drm/mediatek: add mutex mod into ddp private
data
Hi, Yongqiang:
On Wed, 2019-03-27 at 14:18 +0800, yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com wrote:
> From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
>
> mutex0 MOD register offset not always 0x2C.
> for mt8183, that offset will be 0x30,
> add this regsiter offset into private data
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> index 579ce28..7f0d46e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c
> @@ -41,10 +41,12 @@
> #define DISP_REG_CONFIG_DSI_SEL 0x050
> #define DISP_REG_CONFIG_DPI_SEL 0x064
>
> +#define MT2701_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0 0x2C
Lower case, 0x2c.
> +
> #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_EN(n) (0x20 + 0x20 * (n))
> #define DISP_REG_MUTEX(n) (0x24 + 0x20 * (n))
> #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_RST(n) (0x28 + 0x20 * (n))
> -#define DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(n) (0x2c + 0x20 * (n))
> +#define DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(data, n) ((data)->mutex_mod_reg + 0x20 * (n))
Why not just define as:
#define DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(mutex_mod_reg, n) (mutex_mod_reg + 0x20 *
(n))
The mutex_mod_reg inside a structure or not is decided by the caller.
> #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_SOF(n) (0x30 + 0x20 * (n))
> #define DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD2(n) (0x34 + 0x20 * (n))
>
> @@ -147,12 +149,17 @@ struct mtk_disp_mutex {
> bool claimed;
> };
>
> +struct mtk_ddp_data {
> + const unsigned int *mutex_mod;
> + unsigned int mutex_mod_reg;
const
Regards,
cK
> +};
> +
> struct mtk_ddp {
> struct device *dev;
> struct clk *clk;
> void __iomem *regs;
> struct mtk_disp_mutex mutex[10];
> - const unsigned int *mutex_mod;
> + const struct mtk_ddp_data *data;
> };
>
> static const unsigned int mt2701_mutex_mod[DDP_COMPONENT_ID_MAX] = {
> @@ -202,6 +209,21 @@ struct mtk_ddp {
> [DDP_COMPONENT_WDMA1] = MT8173_MUTEX_MOD_DISP_WDMA1,
> };
>
> +static const struct mtk_ddp_data mt2701_ddp_driver_data = {
> + .mutex_mod = mt2701_mutex_mod,
> + .mutex_mod_reg = MT2701_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mtk_ddp_data mt2712_ddp_driver_data = {
> + .mutex_mod = mt2712_mutex_mod,
> + .mutex_mod_reg = MT2701_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mtk_ddp_data mt8173_ddp_driver_data = {
> + .mutex_mod = mt8173_mutex_mod,
> + .mutex_mod_reg = MT2701_DISP_MUTEX0_MOD0,
> +};
> +
> static unsigned int mtk_ddp_mout_en(enum mtk_ddp_comp_id cur,
> enum mtk_ddp_comp_id next,
> unsigned int *addr)
> @@ -464,15 +486,15 @@ void mtk_disp_mutex_add_comp(struct mtk_disp_mutex *mutex,
> reg = MUTEX_SOF_DPI1;
> break;
> default:
> - if (ddp->mutex_mod[id] < 32) {
> - offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(mutex->id);
> + if (ddp->data->mutex_mod[id] < 32) {
> + offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(ddp->data, mutex->id);
> reg = readl_relaxed(ddp->regs + offset);
> - reg |= 1 << ddp->mutex_mod[id];
> + reg |= 1 << ddp->data->mutex_mod[id];
> writel_relaxed(reg, ddp->regs + offset);
> } else {
> offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD2(mutex->id);
> reg = readl_relaxed(ddp->regs + offset);
> - reg |= 1 << (ddp->mutex_mod[id] - 32);
> + reg |= 1 << (ddp->data->mutex_mod[id] - 32);
> writel_relaxed(reg, ddp->regs + offset);
> }
> return;
> @@ -502,15 +524,15 @@ void mtk_disp_mutex_remove_comp(struct mtk_disp_mutex *mutex,
> ddp->regs + DISP_REG_MUTEX_SOF(mutex->id));
> break;
> default:
> - if (ddp->mutex_mod[id] < 32) {
> - offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(mutex->id);
> + if (ddp->data->mutex_mod[id] < 32) {
> + offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD(ddp->data, mutex->id);
> reg = readl_relaxed(ddp->regs + offset);
> - reg &= ~(1 << ddp->mutex_mod[id]);
> + reg &= ~(1 << ddp->data->mutex_mod[id]);
> writel_relaxed(reg, ddp->regs + offset);
> } else {
> offset = DISP_REG_MUTEX_MOD2(mutex->id);
> reg = readl_relaxed(ddp->regs + offset);
> - reg &= ~(1 << (ddp->mutex_mod[id] - 32));
> + reg &= ~(1 << (ddp->data->mutex_mod[id] - 32));
> writel_relaxed(reg, ddp->regs + offset);
> }
> break;
> @@ -585,7 +607,7 @@ static int mtk_ddp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return PTR_ERR(ddp->regs);
> }
>
> - ddp->mutex_mod = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> + ddp->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ddp);
>
> @@ -598,9 +620,12 @@ static int mtk_ddp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id ddp_driver_dt_match[] = {
> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex", .data = mt2701_mutex_mod},
> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex", .data = mt2712_mutex_mod},
> - { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex", .data = mt8173_mutex_mod},
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex",
> + .data = &mt2701_ddp_driver_data},
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex",
> + .data = &mt2712_ddp_driver_data},
> + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> + .data = &mt8173_ddp_driver_data},
> {},
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ddp_driver_dt_match);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists