linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] x86/boot: Introduce helpers for serial I/O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:52:26 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] x86/boot: Introduce helpers for serial I/O

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 02:28:55PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:11:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Any idea how it can be done?
> 
> Like this?
> 
> static u8 serial_inb(unsigned long addr, int offset)

It's not a generic serial_in()...

> {
> 	if (early_serial_do_mmio) {
> 		asm volatile("movb %1,%0" : "=q" (v) : "m" (*(volatile u8 __force *)addr));
> 
> 		return v;
> 	} else {
> 		 return inb(addr + offset);
> 	}
> }

What about mmio32 as next step?

Do we have to "fix" earlyprintk implementation in kernel to do the same?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko