[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190328142302.GE9224@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 16:23:02 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] x86/boot: Split out parse_serial_port() helper
for earlyprintk
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:03:29PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 03:50:15PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Can, but with code uglifying to workaround kstrtox() restrictions.
> > simple_strtox() _just works_ as expected.
>
> simple_strtox() also has its problems.
Yes! And point here: we do not care.
> > Requires buffer copying, finding digits there, making a proper termination. And
>
> It needs a single kstrtoull() call to parse the port.
No, it does not. It needs more as I described. Have you investigated a topic?
Have you seen all possible combinations of input here?
> And we have
> kstrtoull() available in the compressed stage so pls do the conversion
> ontop.
If it's strong opinion, I consider this rather as NAK.
Thank you for review.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists