lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:58:28 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpio: of: Fix of_gpiochip_add() error path

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 2:13 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:

> If the call to of_gpiochip_scan_gpios() in of_gpiochip_add() fails, no
> error handling is performed.  This lead to the need of callers to call
> of_gpiochip_remove() on failure, which causes "BAD of_node_put() on ..."
> if the failure happened before the call to of_node_get().
>
> Fix this by adding proper error handling.
>
> Note that calling gpiochip_remove_pin_ranges() multiple times causes no
> harm: subsequent calls are a no-op.
>
> Fixes: dfbd379ba9b7431e ("gpio: of: Return error if gpio hog configuration failed")
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

Patch applied.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ