linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: demote anon DRAM pages to PMEM node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:59:30 -0700
From:   Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc:     "mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        "riel@...riel.com" <riel@...riel.com>,
        "hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@...el.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
        "Du, Fan" <fan.du@...el.com>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: demote anon DRAM pages to PMEM node



On 3/27/19 6:08 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:41:15PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>> On 3/26/19 5:35 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> migration nodes have higher free capacity than source nodes. And since
>>> your attempting THP's without ever splitting them, that also requires
>>> lower fragmentation for a successful migration.
>> Yes, it is possible. However, migrate_pages() already has logic to
>> handle such case. If the target node has not enough space for migrating
>> THP in a whole, it would split THP then retry with base pages.
> Oh, you're right, my mistake on splitting. So you have a good best effort
> migrate, but I still think it can fail for legitimate reasons that should
> have a swap fallback.

Yes, it still could fail. I can't tell which way is better for now. I 
just thought scanning another round then migrating should be still 
faster than swapping off the top of my head.

Thanks,
Yang