[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <599849e6-05b6-1e4d-7578-5cf8825963d2@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:59:30 -0700
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc: "mhocko@...e.com" <mhocko@...e.com>,
"mgorman@...hsingularity.net" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
"riel@...riel.com" <riel@...riel.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@...el.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"Du, Fan" <fan.du@...el.com>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: demote anon DRAM pages to PMEM node
On 3/27/19 6:08 AM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 08:41:15PM -0700, Yang Shi wrote:
>> On 3/26/19 5:35 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
>>> migration nodes have higher free capacity than source nodes. And since
>>> your attempting THP's without ever splitting them, that also requires
>>> lower fragmentation for a successful migration.
>> Yes, it is possible. However, migrate_pages() already has logic to
>> handle such case. If the target node has not enough space for migrating
>> THP in a whole, it would split THP then retry with base pages.
> Oh, you're right, my mistake on splitting. So you have a good best effort
> migrate, but I still think it can fail for legitimate reasons that should
> have a swap fallback.
Yes, it still could fail. I can't tell which way is better for now. I
just thought scanning another round then migrating should be still
faster than swapping off the top of my head.
Thanks,
Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists