[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <155389932276.20095.12054188967513679921@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:42:02 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: jbrunet@...libre.com, mturquette@...libre.com,
nixiaoming@...wei.com, rnayak@...com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
soren.brinkmann@...inx.com
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk:Fix divide by 0 error in divider_ro_round_rate_parent
Quoting nixiaoming (2019-03-29 02:05:24)
> In the function divider_recalc_rate The judgment of the return value of
Please write divider_recalc_rate() with parenthesis to show it's a
function.
> _get_div indicates that the return value of _get_div may be 0.
__get_div()
> In order to avoid the divide-by-zero error, add check the return value
> of _get_div in the divider_ro_round_rate_parent
>
> Signed-off-by: nixiaoming <nixiaoming@...wei.com>
Is this your name? nixiaoming? Or is it written some other way?
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index e5a1726..0854e3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,8 @@ long divider_ro_round_rate_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *parent,
> int div;
>
> div = _get_div(table, val, flags, width);
> + if (!div) /* avoid divide-by-zero */
> + return -EINVAL;
How does _get_div() return 0? What is the value of 'flags' here when
this goes wrong?
>
> /* Even a read-only clock can propagate a rate change */
> if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT) {
> --
> 1.8.5.6
>
Wow that's a 5 year old version of git!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists