lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190329232215.itsvo3jj3lu4gr7k@ltop.local>
Date:   Sat, 30 Mar 2019 00:22:17 +0100
From:   Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>
To:     Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@...il.com>
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: events: fix  error directive in argument list

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 01:23:03AM +0530, Hariprasad Kelam wrote:
> This patch fixes below spare errors.
> 
> Sparse error:
> make C=2 CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__ M=net/core
> ./include/trace/events/neigh.h:73:1: error: directive in argument list
> ./include/trace/events/neigh.h:78:1: error: directive in argument list
> ./include/trace/events/neigh.h:150:1: error: directive in argument list
> ./include/trace/events/neigh.h:155:1: error: directive in argument list
> 
> Changes below two lines to signle line to avoid sparse error
>  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
>                if (n->tbl->family == AF_INET6) {
> to if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && n->tbl->family == AF_INET6)
> 
> and removes reassigning pin6 pointer when IPV6 is enabled
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hariprasad.kelam@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/trace/events/neigh.h | 19 +++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/neigh.h b/include/trace/events/neigh.h
> index 0bdb085..6e310ea 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/neigh.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/neigh.h
> @@ -70,15 +70,11 @@ TRACE_EVENT(neigh_update,
>  		else
>  			*p32 = 0;
>  
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -		if (n->tbl->family == AF_INET6) {
> -			pin6 = (struct in6_addr *)__entry->primary_key6;
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && n->tbl->family == AF_INET6)
>  			*pin6 = *(struct in6_addr *)n->primary_key;

Why removing the line wheer pin6 is assigned?
IMO, the patch should be:
-#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
-		if (n->tbl->family == AF_INET6) {
+		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && n->tbl->family == AF_INET6)
 			pin6 = (struct in6_addr *)__entry->primary_key6;
  			*pin6 = *(struct in6_addr *)n->primary_key;

> @@ -147,15 +143,10 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(neigh__update,
>  		else
>  			*p32 = 0;
>  
> -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> -		if (n->tbl->family == AF_INET6) {
> -			pin6 = (struct in6_addr *)__entry->primary_key6;

Same here.

-- Luc Van Oostenryck

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ