[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0263068e-f2d0-1101-0438-0f570f0b38e7@ce.jp.nec.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 03:05:52 +0000
From: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "bhe@...hat.com" <bhe@...hat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com" <fanc.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
"kasong@...hat.com" <kasong@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"kexec@...ts.infradead.org" <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot: Use EFI setup data if provided
On 3/29/19 12:52 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> static acpi_physical_address
> __efi_get_rsdp_addr(unsigned long config_tables, unsigned int nr_tables,
> int size, bool efi_64)
>
>
>> {
>> acpi_physical_address rsdp_addr = 0;
>
> You don't need that variable and can return "table" or 0 after the endif
> below.
I could do that but it will slightly change the current logic.
Existing code does this:
if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_TABLE_GUID)))
rsdp_addr = table;
else if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID)))
return table;
I thought it was to return the table for ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID
if both tables exist. If we remove rsdp_addr, the code will be:
if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_TABLE_GUID)))
return table;
else if (!(efi_guidcmp(guid, ACPI_20_TABLE_GUID)))
return table;
So if there are 2 tables, we return the one that comes first.
Is it ok?
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation / NEC Solution Innovators, Ltd.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists